COME TO THINK OF IT, SEX!
(Adult-based)
As Written By
Mr. Ben
.
Preface
To the male folk, sex is seen as one of means of releasing tension. On the other hand, the female folk see sex as the expression of love. Arguably, they are right in their assertions. However, the appropriations given to this term are not practically correct. The question that comes to focus is ‘what should be the practically correct definition of sex, irrespective of gender?’
The book titled Come To Think Of It, Sex! Is a driven_ by_ inspiration interest which focuses on the true qualities of sex as the basis for its definition. It is pleasure _ filled, somewhat funny but posses didactic remarks on the appropriation of sex.
It is a mini-sized book that has in its identity creatively designed chapters that give the reader not only a sense of appropriation but the urge to thirst for more.
The chapters in this book are designed such that they complemented each other. How?
The juxtaposition of the God-factor as the originator of the issue, sex, with the worldly influence on it (as we progress) is obviously stated.
Simply, Come To Think Of It Sex! Creatively puts to computation (arithmetic calculation) the sex life of different individual asserts the factors responsible for sex and explains its “inevitables”.Based on computation it extrapolates the future of the mentioned sex-performing individuals, all other things being equal, when the institution, marriage, knocks on their doors.
The didactic remarks as the book considers refer to how caution could be exercised, no matter the temptation or lust-filled desire until a realistic ‘I’m married’ philosophy becomes the very one’s mentioned statement!
Undoubtedly, several questions are bound to be asked. The answers are here! Flip this page!
MR. BEN
DEDICATION
TO THE MATURED MIND
Acknowledgment
No doubt, all glory and heartfelt worship I give to god because he is the originator of my existence and the back bone of this great work. Without his eminence, I cannot proceed with it.
Moreover, to friends, family members and other well- wishers who have in one way or the other given their ‘go- ahead’ encouragements, I would want to say a big thank you are more than a thousand billion goldmines to me!
WARNING
IF YOU ARE LESS THAN 18, IT IS ADVISABLE NOT TO READ THIS!
INTRODUCTION
In the first place, what is sex? This timeless classic elucidates in chapters the qualities that make it special.
Chapter 1 explains the ‘simplicity’ nature of sex. As mentioned earlier, the inevitable are the already understood male and female reproductive organs. They will be creatively detailed with respect to their actions.
Chapter two elaborates on the ‘eroticism’ quality of sex. It was said that the chapters complemented each other they depicts a relationship amongst themselves hence, chapter 2 explains in details the dynamics of chapter 1.
Chapter 3 asserts the product of the coming together of chapters 1 and 2, ‘experience’. Based on empirical findings, it gives a classic arithmetic computation of the sex life of individuals number of times individuals (males and females) have had marriage (other conditions put in place, as we will read subsequently), extrapolates what likely become of them before and even after marriage. Also it issues worth listening statements to enable sex-performing individuals exercise the c_caution ideology in concrete terms.
From the previous paragraphs, it can be deduced that the term sex has three qualities namely simplicity, eroticism and experience. In simple terms, sex can be analyzed as simply erotic experience (where ‘X’ is pronounced as ‘EX’) or
S-Simply
E-Erotic
X-Xperience.
It should be noted that sex as used in this book refers to sexual intercourse, the direct physical relation existing between a man and woman.
To crown it all, the mentioned qualities will be same as chapters1, 2 and 3 respectively. In other words, chapter1 Simplicity (Simply) chapter 2- Eroticism (Erotic) and chapter 3- Experience (Xperience)
Notice that there is a common element as simple instance from the first to the last chapter. More? Let’s sail through the chapters!
Note that the asserting in the creature inventiveness of the author and the author’s empirical findings (all inspired by God).
CHAPTER 1
(SIMPLY)
SIMPLICITY
The simplicity nature of sex has been a virtue upheld by the creator of universe, God. He had specially structured for the man and woman simplified indicators to be appreciated in terms of their actions at a particular time…
However, given the natural forces of lust and other emotionally exuberant devices, over the years (from the medieval to the present age), the ‘simplified indicators’ have been used to act before the stipulated time. At this juncture, If you are observant, a picture of thoughts should be conveyed in your mind of what is being said.
They say “it takes two to tango”. Let us take a tango dance (performed in a clubhouse) as case study. Usually, a tango dance involves two different parties, a man and a woman. The simplicity of tango dance is the mutual consent by both parties. Then, the dance becomes what it is. In the same vein, the simplified indicators simply consent to each other before the action begins, normally. How?
The ‘simplified indicators’ refer to the already-mentioned male and female reproductive organs. Of course, the former is the PENIS and the latter is the VAGINA.The simplicity in terms of their distinction will be unveiled subsequently. Meanwhile, in analogy, the consent of a man and woman would have to be granted to get the action started.
Tentatively, this points at the simplicity nature of sex. Here, the ‘simplified indicators’ refer to the ‘inevitables’, stated previously.
In this chapter, the simplicity nature of sex is detailed with first identifying using the word play of creativity the parties involved; MAN and WOMAN. First, we analyze the MAN. By definition, this book gives the analysis of a MAN as the Male’s Acted Name or the
M-Male’s
A-Acted
N-Name
On the other hand, the WOMAN, as analyzed in this book, is the Worth of (a) Male’s Acted Name or the
W-Worth
O-Of (a)
M-Male’s
A-Acted
N-Name.
It is an undenied fact that one of the major qualities of a man is his sexuality.
Therefore, his acted name is sexuality. Furthermore, the ‘device’ he employs to act his name is his reproductive penis course. The completion of a Male’s Acted Name is made possible through the consent of his worth, the WOMAN. From creation, a woman had been made to complement or showcase a man. Precisely, a woman depicts the simplicity nature of sex of a man by granting her consent. Interestingly, the ‘device’ used by the woman to demonstrate her consent is her reproductive VAGINA. How? Note that the ‘device’ used in both consents also refers to the ‘simple indicators’.
Next, we demystify creatively the PENIS and VAGINA in terms of their distinct actions. Let us consider the male reproductive organ, the PENIS
THE PENIS
The word play of creativity can be used to explain the simplicity nature of the simply indicators, in this case, the penis. This is a vital device used by the man to obviously depict the Male’s Acted Name (partly, an expression of his sexuality).
‘What is the distinct (dynamic) action of the PENIS of a male?’ You would likely want to ask. The PENIS, in action, is a ‘Pointed’ Extension which is Notably Instrumental (for) Sex. More precisely, the PENIS can be analyzed as the ‘Pointed’ Extension (Erection), Notably Instrumental (for) Sex or
P-‘Pointed’
E-Extension (Erection),
N-Notably
I-Instrumental (for)
S-Sex
In the other words, a Male’s Acted Name is strongly depicted by the action his penis. Generally, the sexuality of a man (or a Males Acted Name) is practically depicted through the description of this penis in action! Partly, these expressions make us realize the simplicity nature of sex_ sex has the quality of simplicity (its simple when looked into)
However, the instrumentality of the male’s penis does not complete a typical sexual intercourse. It is complemented by the granted consent of the ‘device’ used by the woman. It is simply the VAGINA again, let us se what it is
THE VAGINA
This is a very important ‘device’ used by the woman to complement the male’s penis. It is the other simple indicator which must ‘tango’ with the male’s for the ‘dance’ to really begin. This book analyses the VAGINA as the Ventured Area, (the) G-spot influence, Notably Aroused. In the other words, the female’s VAGINA is the Ventured Area, the G-spot influence which is notably aroused. Using the word play of creativity, it can be seen as the
V-Ventured
A-Area, (the)
G-G-spot, WHERE G-SPOT MEANS THE GENITALIA (THE GENITAL)
N-Notably
A-Aroused
This definition is only valid when the action of the VAGINA is pronounced.
The female vagina is the area ventured by then male’s penis, producing notably aroused G-spot influence, thanks to the instrumental pointed extension of the male’s penis (its action).
The previous paragraph shows the simplicity nature of sex the ‘simplified indicators’.
However, what causes the actions of the ‘devices’? What can lead to the granted consent of a man to a woman for the dance to begin? What factor creates the tango? These are questions primarily running through the minds of the readers. The much awaited answers are in the next chapters.
This is what the chapter is all about! Just read on!
CHAPTER TWO
(EROTIC)
EROTICISM
This is an obvious quality of sex. Sex is erotic in nature. Eroticism is the answer given to the previously asked question in chapter 1. The question ‘how?’ comes to focus.
Again, we take a cue from the instance given in chapter 1_the tango dance.
The consent granted by both parties (the man or woman), that is, by the man to the woman or vice versa is made possible by how appealing they are appear. In the first place, what would make the woman grant her consent to the man who asks for a tango dance? What did the man physically see in her that made him ask her for such a dance? What is the factor that makes both parties consent to each other for the dance to begin? These are questions whose answers will be unearthed later.
There is an axiom that says ‘one thing leads to another’. How true! Undoubtedly, there are certain factors that make the man consent to the woman’s request for a tango dance (or vice versa) or both parties consent to each other. They may include obviously seen physical features such as good dentition as unveiled in his or her smiling disposition, an attractive dress code, a ‘draw-closer’ body smell, an appealing beautiful ‘sides’. The lists are endless! These attractions (or one of these attractions) make (or makes) both parties consent to each other. Let us not forget the natural fact that for every action, there is an equal both but opposite reaction. Just as certain diseases have associated symptoms or signs, so is it for the moved_ by_ the_ physical looks man or woman who eventually agree to dance. There is a feel, passion and probably innate desire to get along with the concern party (in that man or woman). In other words, the mentioned physical factors leads to the reaction observed in the man or woman (attracted) reflecting as the body chemistry signs- the urge to get along with the man or woman attracted to. Simply certain ‘go-and –make advances signs’ develop in the physically attracted man or woman.
The ‘go-and-make-advances’ signs are statement Eroticism, a salient quality of sex.
As asserted previously, sex is erotic in nature. In the introduction of this book, this chapter explains the dynamics of chapter 1. Again, this chapter answers the intriguing question of the previous chapter. Let’s find out!
By recognition, eroticism is the emotional desire or feeling of being
Sex_tuned and triggered by certain factors that necessitate reaction of the human erogenous zones. These factors may be nude sex pictures, the individual’s or position. In this book, the word play creatively given to this term will be analyzed and expatiated. The term ‘erotic’ is an adjective used to describe the feel or urge to having sex due to sex-encouraging factors observed. The body responds to the stimuli. The word ‘erotic’ can be creatively seen as the erogenous reaction, observed through individual chemistry or analyzed as the
E- Erogenous
R-Reaction
O-Observed
T-Through
I- Individual
C-Chemistry
Sex is erotic because of there is an observed reaction of the body’s sex-sensitive parts (In this case, the ‘simple indicators’), the erogenous zones. The erogenous reaction is observed through the individual’s body chemistry. From the previously given instance, it can be said the physical attractions (mentioned) that give the consent of the woman to the man (or vice versa) for the tango dance to begin is analogous to the erogenous reaction observed through the individuals’ body chemistry for the ‘tango dance’ to begin.
Eroticism can be creatively seen as the erogenous reaction observed through individual chemistry, the initiated sex motion or analyzed as the:
E- Erogenous
R-Reaction
O-Observed
T-Through
I- Individual
C-Chemistry,(the)
I-Initiated
S-Sex
M-Motion
Obviously, eroticism is the state of being erotic. What makes an individual erotic? it is simply the initiated. Sex Motion. The dynamics of the body chemistry in response to sex-tuned factors initiates the motion of sex. How?
What is really the sex motion? The sex motion can be explained via the dynamic action of the ‘simple indicators’, the PENIS and VAGINA respectively.
For man eroticism, based on the earlier mentioned sex- tuned factors, accounts for the pointed extension of penis which is instrumental for tango dance’. On the other hand, for a woman, whose ‘simple indicator’ complements a man’s by virtue of her granted consent, eroticism is the factor which explains the area ventured by the man’s penis where the G-sport influence is notably aroused. The ventured area is the female’s vagina. This is what the sex motion is all about.
The situation(s) where the initiated sex motion is acted is or are called…... just sail with me to the next chapter!
CHAPTER 3
(XPERIENCE)
EXPERIENCE
In a way, experience is the answer or the completion of the stated “the situation (s) where the initiated sex motion is or are acted in called…………….” This vividly the eventuality of sex_sex is an experience. The experiences (s) of sex has or have undoubtedly led various peoples of the world to adopt different sex likes ranging from the normal (simple) to the unusually life of sex disposition. Perhaps, the seemingly unlimited bounds of civilization have lured individuals (especially youths) into believing that everyone has a right to enjoy sexual freedom, neglecting the conspicuous aftermaths that follow. Indeed, the different sex lives of individuals especially before marriage; ‘the particular time’) have created discrepancies in rightly asserting their personalities.
This chapter brings to the spotlight a classic computation (arithmetic calculation) on the number of times a people have had sex before marriage. This can only be numerically phatomable provided their sincerity (in terms of record keeping) is pronounced. Awkward, isn’t it? Based on the computation reached, it asserts the various sex lives (by description of label) of different individuals (using a particular individual, A, say, as case study which is model for others irrespective of gender), extrapolates their future from the present, all other things being equal, before and even after marriage.
Interestingly, it conveys didactic remarks on how they can practically appropriate sex. These are to be detailed later. Meanwhile, we are cruising back to base_ the tango dance. In this case, the experience is gained either by the man or woman or both during the dance after which the parties involved may wish to stick to each other or part ways to gain more experience from other tango dance partners. If both parties satisfied with each other’s tango dance steps, they will remain the very seemingly inseparable tango partners. If it is the other way round, that is, if the man or woman is practically an “Oliver twist”, there is vividly the likelihood of both parties parting ways to explore different tango dance step of others in the particular club house, all in the name of having various experiences needed. After all, variety is the spice of life!
In the same vein, this is partly what the sex lives of individuals become. This brings us to particular issues: the definitions of what individuals arguable see sex as, which eventually ascertain their lifeslyles. Basically they are the So Exciting Xperience or
S- So
E-Exciting
X-Xperience and Simply Exiting Experience or
S-Simply
E-Exiting
X-Xperience
What is the practical distinction between the two defined terms? The distinction practically pin points at the various sex lives of individuals.
The defined So Exciting Xperience practically zeros on the sex lives of individual who have exceeded their bounds of having sex, that is, exercising sexual freedom with different partners, though they arguably tend to exercise caution, they are let loose by what sex tunes them. Seldom, they say “experience is the best teacher”. In the quest for this ‘truth’, they adventure from one partner to the other, toting to multiple sex partners. In analogy, they are “OliverTwist-like” in nature; the ones that would not be satisfied with the tango dance steps of the other parties. They argue that sex is an important tool to depict immense love (especially the women) and a way to depict the qualities of manhood (the male folks). Unfortunately, these are not all there is.
On the other hand, the defined Simply Exciting Xperience practically pinpoints at the sex lives of individuals who (in a way) uphold the virtue of being faithful to their respectively partners, irrespective of what happens. However, this does not guarantee absolute safety because the risks the “Oliver twist – like” individual are exposed to are the same to this category of individuals as there are doubts of their respective partners’ fidelity, probably based on past relationships and other commitments. In fact, individuals whose sex lives practically reflect on the So Exciting Xperience inclination would with panache bring to recognition the ‘equality of sexual freedom’. Their stance is as there is sincerely no trust in the partners they deal with, it is encouraging for them to “balance the equation” by being more “experienced”, gallivanting (in the name of exuberance) from one partner to the other even as their partners do the same. Obviously, that is their though pattern. Nonetheless, the faithful ones are comparatively less likely to risk themselves to certain health and physical hazards cause there is an existing mutual confidence between them and their partners. This is what “the sex adventurers” are practically deficient of.
If you are married and reading this, I would like to ask you (a rather) awkward question:
‘Before marriage, how many times have you had sex?” Do not trivialize this as it would be very necessary. Probably, you are looking at me with disdain! It is understandable. As a matter of fact; if use this question to X-ray different people on the streets, living in a district or community, you will be amazed at the various responses you would get. Some will give a questionable numerical figure (taking the question with levity), others will not answer you, believing that you want to infringe on their privacy. Funny enough, other individuals would say something like” I will tell you later’ while others will respond by unleashing life-threatening words and actions on you. However, if sex is an experience, should it be an off-the-record account, worth remembering and documenting, kept as secret for a time but (think about this question: is anything hidden under the sun?) or something to remembered when you are in the grave!?
If it is an off-the –record account, then why waist your time on a task you will not commend of yourself of doing; after all, anything worth doing is worth doing well?
If it is worth remembering and documenting, then you should be congratulated!
This is because you are about exercising empirical knowledge to others (interested), letting them (the wise ones) learn what are ordinarily vague when taught and possibly help improve the sex life of others before and after the particular time (marriage).
If you are advocating that it should be kept secret for a time, think of the question asked. Do you know that the wall has ears? One way or the other, the other party you had it with will unravel to his or her world what really happened. In time, this could be implicating.
If you are that individual who sees the experience, sex, as something to be remembered when you are in the grave, what an exclamation it is. Remember, it is just one life you and I have to leave.
If you portray this disposition, it means that you are in a state of guilt. Imagine you carrying this burden of guilt all your life. How miserable you would be! No one can share it with?
Then, you are out of this world! Frankly, you are in a world of your own.
How can an individual best know the actual number of times he or she had had sex before marriage? The answer is quite simple, through very trivial. It is best answered when you have a record of the number of partners you have ‘engaged’ yourself with. More precisely, keeping a record of how many times partner A for instance had engaged you or the number of times partners (A, B, C, D,E…Z) have engaged you. Do not joke or feel insulted about what is being said we are arriving at something. If you are dazzled at what you are reading, here are some statistics that keep you glued to the edge.
If you are a regular on the internet, search for the life and times of the partners Johnny Holmes (perhaps, a Google search engine would do). It is said that he slept with over 10,000 women in his lifetime. However, this book considers the numbers of times an individual had had sex before marriage. Let us assume that before he got married, he had slept with 8,000 women, (‘engaging’ every woman twice). It means that he had sex 16,000 times before he got married!
An Italian footballer (name withheld) who currently plays professional football for Sampodoria claims that he had slept with over 600 women.
Let us assume that he had slept with 300 women before he got married and similarly engaged a woman twice, definitely, by simple arithmetic, he must had sex at an exact numeric figure of 600!
Another instance is the case of a well known Jewish American porn star (name withheld). According to him, he had slept with over 3000 women. Let us say he slept with 1,500 women before he got married and as usual, engaged a woman twice. It follows that the numeric figure of 3000 gives the number of times he had had sex.
Though most of Celebs keep records of their sex escapades, they acquire the experiences via the previous relationships they engage themselves in various one_ night_ stand gatherings, for_ the_ moment situations or professional video coverages (pornography). Take a cue from this. I mean, keep records of your sex adventure it will help you once way or the other, if not now, definitely in the future to define your sexual disposition. If you are convinced, let us see the zenith of this issue!
For the individual, A, the number of times he (or she) had sex is partly dependent on the number of relationships engaged in, taking to cognizance the first sex had. Below is an arithmetic computation of the number of time an individual, A, had had sex. Let us establish the following parameters. Note that the number of times individual A had engaged in sex is before the particular time…. Marriage. Here are the parameters used.
a. Let the first time individual, A, had sex. (with partner, a, say ) be X
b. Let the subsequent number of times individual A had had sex be X1, (with the same partner)
c. Perhaps there is an eventual break-up, let number of times individual a had engaged in sex in subsequent relationships with the partners (b, c, d, e… say,) be X2,
d. Considering the number of times individual A had had for_the moment/one-night-stand sex, with partners ( f, g, h, l,….)., If individual A had engaged in such).Let the number of times individual A had engaged in one-night-stand/ for_ the_ moment sex be X3 (with partners f, g, h, l… ).
e. Assuming individual A ‘hooks up’ with a would-be life-long marriage material (partners Z, say) let the number of times individual A had sexually engaged partners Z be X4. This is before marriage
f. Considering the parameters, we can compute (arithmetically) the numbers of times individual A had engaged in sex before marriage. Let the numbers of times individual A engaged in sex be represented by n. therefore, it follows that: n = X ± X1 ± X2 ± X3 ± X4. In other words, the number of times individual A had engaged in sex can be given as : the first time individual A had sex (with partner a, say ) ± the subsequent number of times individual A had sex with the same partner ± the number of times individual A had engaged in subsequent relationships (with partners b, c, d, e…, say,) ± the Number of times individual A had engaged in a one-night-stand/ for the moment sex (with partners f, g, h, I, ….) ± Number of times individual A had engaged in sex with partners Z (the would_ be _ life_ long marriage material).
For convenience, let us represent the following
a. n by N (Number of times)
b. X by No (with partner A)
c. X1 by N1 (with the same partner)
d. X2 by N2 (with partners’ b, c, d, e…)
e. X3 by N3 (with partners f, g, h, I …)
f. X4 by N4 (with partners Z)
Therefore, n= X ± X1 ± X2 ± X3 ± X4 becomes N= No ± N1 N2 ± N3 ± N4
The plus (or addition) sign represent an ‘agreed’ number of times while the minus (or subtraction) sign represent ‘not-agreed’ number of times. For instance, if individual A has not engaged in N1 and N2 but only No and N3, then N becomes No +N3+N4. This is to be explained later.
The general computation N= No ± N1 ± N2 ± N3 ± N4 has different interpretations or translations. For example, N= No + N1 + N3 (if there is a ‘not-agreed’ N2 and N4). Although, there are actually 13 interpretations to this equation, we will, for convenience, consider seven of them. For more information, you can read the work, titled ‘The Code-13 Principle’ and/or ‘Postulation of the Sex Arithmetic and The Way Forward’.
Now, let us give the seven interpretations at the generalized computation ( the major ones)
a. N = No+ N1 + N2 + N3+N4
b. N = No + N4
c. N =No + N2 + N4
d. N = No + N2
e. N = No + N3
f. N = No + N1 + N4
g. N = No
Observe that the common element No is present. This is because it plays a significant role. What makes No special and without No, what happens to the equation? Questions are indeed pleading for answers.
A, B, C, D, E, F and G are the possible implications or interpretations of the generalized equation (computation) N = No ± N1 ± N2 ± N3 ± N4
The various computations of N in A, B, C, D, E, F and G represent the sex lives of different individuals. Hence, a label or description to categorize individuals whose sex lives fall under the computations will be used. Also, the implications and likely extrapolations of what becomes of them will be brought to limelight. Meanwhile, if No is absent, then the equation has no validity. Just read for more answers let us begin with (A).